For just one example of the "proven track record" of water boarding, consider the case of suspected terrorist Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi. After being wrapped in duct tape and stored in a plywood box "for his own protection," the FBI transported al-Libi to Cairo for questioning by experts in "'enhanced' interrogation techniques." After a water boarding session, al-Libi confessed that Iraq had trained Al-Qaeda in the manufacture of bombs and poison gas. Secretary of State Colin Powell used this incontrovertible information as proof positive when he informed the U.N. of the "sinister nexus" between Iraq and Al-Qaeda.
Al-Libi later recanted his "confession" as having been under duress, and the CIA confirmed its falsity.
[Cartoon by the Austin American Statesman's great Ben Sargent. Subscribe to Sargent's work through www.mycomicspage.com.]
2 comments:
Hubby and I were in the car when we heard about the veto. Hubby said "good for him" when he heard. At first I was shocked, and then realized most Americans would probably think the same thing.
It is too diffiuclt for most Americans to imagine that we could ever be wrong. Anyone tortured MUST be a bad guy and anyone being recorded without a warrant MUST be shady.
Exactly. You know what else? With the veto, Bush says that it's o.k. for other countries to water board captured Americans. I wish (a) the media would point that out, and (b) people would give that more thought. There's no reason to think that torture is effective as interrogation and every reason to think that it degrades and dehumanizes anyone who participates.
Post a Comment